- Golf Crazy... : ...Teed Off.
- Receive email updates from the OAG Press Office:.
- CONTENT DEVELOPMENT.
- Beware of Auto Repair Fraud!
If you have been taken advantage of by one of these companies, or are a victim of a scam, contact your local consumer protection agency, state Attorney General, or Better Business Bureau for help. You may also file a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission.
Your Browser Is Incompatible
Explore our consumer credit counseling services. We offer debt consolidation and debt management programs, bankruptcy counseling, foreclosure prevention counseling, housing counseling, and a variety of financial education programs.
Do you want to continue working? Select OK to extend your session or Cancel to allow your session to expire.
How to Spot a Fraud
While this list not all-inclusive, it demonstrates that not all damages cases are the same. In most instances, the cost to replace or repair will carry the day, but in some cases the economic waste doctrine may apply. For the alert contractor, invoking the doctrine can substantially impact the ultimate resolution. If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries lexology.
Beware of Credit Repair Scams
The newsfeeds are a good measure of a firm's expertise and offer an interesting insight into recent legal developments. I would highly recommend Lexology to colleagues.
- Credit-Repair Scams: Beware!.
- The Ruins, Or, Meditation on the Revolutions of Empires and the Law of Nature.
- The Colour of Desire (Mills & Boon comics)!
- Commercial tenants beware: Make sure you understand your repair obligations;
Repair and reinstatement: Beware the elephant trap | HSTalks
USA October 22 Jurisdictions differ in how they apply the economic loss doctrine, but here are some considerations that may tip the scale: What would be the probable change in market value of the property if the repair is made? And, to what extent would the cost to repair or replace exceed any decrease in value caused by the defect?
Does the claimed defect provide similar general quality and appearance to that which the owner contracted for? Would making the repair require substantial destruction, significant dismantling, or unreasonable expense?
To what extent does the defect relate to an aesthetic aspect of the property? Is the defect related to a personal customization? Is it offensive to aesthetic sensibilities? What is the property used for and what is the effect of the defect on such use?